Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-AnneCastles & Museums

The Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-Anne

The Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-Anne features three museums and a nature reserve

After Suzanna and I had enjoyed our 12 km morning walk around the area, we visited the Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-Anne. It’s listed as one of Wallonia’s exceptional heritage sites. Not surprisingly, it’s a popular tourist destination, and a much sought after location for society weddings. It’s certainly a beautiful and well-maintained castle with an attractive courtyard garden. P1050004 (2)_1280x666

P1050007_1280x719

P1050048_1280x622

The castle is fully open to the public, with 32 furnished and decorated rooms to discover. It is separated into three museums.

The first two museums

The first is the Museum of the Life of the Lords of Lavaux in the 17th century, showing how they lived, what they wore, what they eat and drank, where they slept etc. The second area is in the cellars. Here, the Museum of Rural Life presents everyday objects, customs and rural festivals of the late 19th century.

I found these two museums interesting. Each of the rooms has plenty of fascinating antiquities to investigate. They are well displayed and described, and in many of the rooms there is tasteful atmospheric music playing.

The third museum

I had some reservations about the third museum. It’s called the Museum of Nature and Hunting, and its objective is to “reveal the wealth of wildlife to be found in the Famenne region.”

However, it’s full of stuffed animals; scores of them distributed over a dozen or so rooms. Personally I question whether dead animals are the best way to reveal the wealth of living wildlife in an area.

All these creatures have at some point in the past been shot or trapped. I understand that in the absence of natural predators, there is a place for the culling of wild boar and deer. But I don’t like to see stuffed owls, falcons, hawks, buzzards, eagles, a vulture, ducks, geese, grebes, songbirds, finches, a bee-eater, a golden oriole, a kingfisher, a heron, weasels, stoats, badgers, foxes – all of them presumably victims of the sport of hunting and shooting.

In that respect the animals display the PAST wealth of wildlife in the area; not necessarily the PRESENT biodiversity (which could be less after all these animals had been killed!).

Of course, a museum by definition deals with the past. This one in particular gives a snapshot of the hunting culture of years gone by. But I do think there might be better ways of revealing the current wealth of wildlife in a region. For example:

  • Photographs: There are many superb nature photographers around who could display their pictures of the local wildlife. I would rather see a photo of a wild boar than its head mounted as a trophy on a wall.

P1050016 (2)_1280x920

  • Videos: Naturalists now use special night cameras to capture the movements of nocturnal animals. I would rather see an infrared movie of a badger emerging from its sett than a stuffed badger.

To be honest, there was a small room that displayed some lovely photographs of deer. But in the next few rooms I was brought down to earth by displays of all sorts of traps and guns, which some people, especially children, may find upsetting.

P1050043 (2)_1280x531

There was even a poster showing how a roe deer reacts to being shot in various body parts:

P1050040 (2)_1280x829

So as a Museum of Hunting, I can see it serves some purpose – although personally it did not appeal to me. But as a Museum of Nature I felt it fell somewhat short.

Nature reserve

However, to give credit to the Castle, the owners do seem to be genuinely concerned with nature conservation. In their grounds they have devoted quite an extensive area to natural wetland, with ponds and reedbeds sheltering a great variety of fauna and flora.

P1050053_1280x719

P1050054_1280x719

P1050057_1280x719

It’s possible to walk through this area, and information panels tell you what to look out for. It’s an excellent initiative that is surprisingly refreshing after walking through the Museum of Hunting and Nature.

And after all, what the Castle is doing practically for local nature outside its four walls is more important than what it is displaying inside. So in that respect the Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-Anne gets a big thumbs up.

What do you think?

Have you visited the Castle of Lavaux-Sainte-Anne? What were your impressions?

If you haven’t, would you be put off by stuffed animals? What are your children’s reactions when they see stuffed animals, animal traps and guns?

Looking forward to your thoughts.

The castle’s response

I sent this post to the castle and received this reply:

“In 1930 our castle was a total ruin. It was restored in 1933 thanks to a donation of 4 million euros from Baroness Lemonnier.

“In return for her donation, she wanted a hunting museum in the castle in loving memory of her husband who died in 1930 (hunting was his hobby). We still respect her order and that’s why there are stuffed animals in parts of the castle to show all the animals that live in this area.

“Some of these animals no longer live in our area (not all because of the hunt) and some were never hunted here such as the kingfisher. The protected animals were just found dead, were stuffed and given to us to complete our collection. Our goal is to respect the Baroness’s order and to show the animals of the area.

“Some people don’t like it, others do, and children find it great to touch a deer or a fox, without risk. I think different people have different views. Wouldn’t it be boring if everyone thought the same?”

Here’s a pin for your Pinterest boards:

 

31 replies »

    • Thanks for opening the comments Guido and adding your opinion. I somehow doubt if any wedding photos are taken in that particular area of the castle!

    • Yes Suzanne you’re right. And one of the amazing things about castles in Wallonia is that no two look the same, as they have all been built at different times when different countries have been reigning.

  1. What a fabulous looking castle and the grounds and nature conservation looks wonderful. As for the stuffed animals inside, well I guess it was part of that time to display them.

  2. Denzil – I agree with you – I would not have enjoyed seeing all the ways to trap birds – and the poster with the reactions of a doe being shot was an odd choice to put up in this conservation environment. Good thought provoking post.

    • Thanks Amy, I think these kinds of museums were all the rage in the Victorian Age. But not in 2018.

    • Thanks Carrie. You’re right about ghoulish, especially as so many of these stuffed animals seem to be grinning!

  3. That castle is enchanting, no wonder folks want to be married there. With one tower dipped into the moat and the other I presume on land, I can see knights and horses, ladies and children riding up for supper. The bell shaped roofs are really lovely. But I agree with you about the Museum of Nature – it’s gruesome.

  4. I enjoy visiting castles, their interiors and their grounds, and this one seems to tick all the boxes for my curiosity and interest in architecture and nature. The stuffed animals aren’t my thing either. I think you expressed your thoughts and findings about the third museum well. That being said, it does provide a lot of (good and relevant) information about hunting. Just not my thing, but informative nevertheless. And, yes, I’d rather see photos than animal trophies. Actually, I’d rather see them life (and live) in the wild.

  5. What a wonderful situation, Denzil! That first shot is beautiful. 🙂 🙂 I’d have loved the first 2 museums and the wetlands, but I’d probably have just bypassed the hunting one. Weapons/stuffed animals aren’t something I want to see and you can certainly appreciate them respecting the wishes of the donor. It’s a nice reply, isn’t it, and leaves you in no doubt. I have to be careful what I wish for. Since yesterday that sunshine that I wished to share with you has departed. Maybe it’s down your way? 🙂

    • Yes Jo your sunny weather has made its way down here, with a few sturdy evening thunderclaps. Yes I am pleased the castle replied to explain the third museum.

  6. From the castle’s reply it sounds like the hunting museum is an artefact of its time. Politically incorrect for today, but an interesting insight, not only to hunting, but also to the attitude to hunting in the early 20th century. The deer poster is indeed particularly gruesome and amazing to display.

    • You’re right Hugh. I can imagine the difficulties that parents/grandparents could have in explaining that poster to young children. Even I found it impossible to look at without grimacing.

I welcome your comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.